Skip to main content
Solutions

One emissions reduction can return value to everyone who funds it

Suppliers recover value from the emissions reductions they make. Buyers reduce Scope 3 emissions at the suppliers they already buy from. Investors finance verified emissions reductions and hold the credits.

By role

Choose a route

There are three ways to take part in the same verified emissions reduction.

Suppliers, producers, operators and developers

Value back for emissions reductions

A credit in the supplier’s name for each verified tonne, allocated to co-funders or sold.

Sustainability, procurement and finance teams

Reduce Scope 3 with suppliers

Co-fund a project at a named supplier and receive credits for the funded share.

Funds, lenders and treasuries

Finance verified emissions reductions

Contracted credits backed by emissions reductions checked against a verification report.

Step by step

From a shared supplier to a verified credit

Every project follows the same seven steps, and each step has a named owner and leaves a record.

  1. 1Supplier, buyers, Carbon3

    Scoping and project definition

    Buyers find a supplier they share in the Data Hub. With the supplier they define the change, the baseline, the methodology, the monitoring plan and each funder’s share.

  2. 2Verifier

    Validation report

    Before anything is built, the verifier reviews the design and confirms the project scope, baseline, additionality and monitoring plan.

  3. 3Supplier

    Implementation

    The supplier installs the change and records the monitoring data. Co-funders pay as agreed, often up front or against milestones.

  4. 4Verifier

    Verification report

    After the monitoring period, the verifier checks the data and states the verified emissions reduction in tonnes of CO₂e.

  5. 5Project developer, on the Carbon3 registry

    Issuance to the project developer

    Realized credits, one per tonne in the verification report, are issued to the supplier and recorded on the Carbon3 registry. Future credits can also be issued to it earlier, once the project is validated. They stay labeled Future, and buyers who take them carry the delivery risk. The verifier does not issue credits.

  6. 6Supplier

    Allocation

    Credits are transferred to each co-funder in proportion to its contribution. Every transfer is recorded.

  7. 7Each holder

    Sale or retirement

    Holders retire credits against their Scope 3 reporting, or sell the credits they do not need.

Who pays, who gains

What each party puts in and takes out

Every project has the same four roles. Only the supplier and the funders hold credits.

Supplier

Owns the site and implements the project

Pays or bringsPart of the capital cost, the implementation work, the monitoring data and the project documents.
GainsCo-funding that makes the investment viable, lower Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and credits for its own share that it can sell.

Buyers

Companies that purchase from the supplier

Pays or bringsA share of the project cost, agreed before implementation and paid up front or against milestones.
GainsCredits in proportion to that share, tied to a named supplier in their own Scope 3, with the reports attached.

Investors

Funds, lenders or treasuries

Pays or bringsUp-front finance, often for the part of the cost buyers do not cover.
GainsA contracted volume of credits to hold, sell to buyers in the chain or retire.

Verifier

Validation and verification body, separate from Carbon3

Pays or bringsThe validation and verification work, under a recognized methodology.
GainsA fee paid by the project. It holds no credits and is never paid by Carbon3.

Credits follow the money. A funder that pays 50% of the project cost receives 50% of the verified credits, and the split is fixed before the first credit is issued.

Illustrative
Worked example

Two apparel brands and an investor fund a dye house

A textile dyeing and finishing mill that supplies two apparel brands replaces a coal-fired steam boiler with an industrial heat pump. The brands and an investor share the cost.

Who pays what

50%Buyer A (apparel brand)30%Buyer B (apparel brand)20%Investor C
Illustrative cost split and credits
FunderSharePaysCredits, years 1 to 5Of which future credits (years 1 and 2)
Buyer A (apparel brand)50%€500,00010,500 t3,000 t
Buyer B (apparel brand)30%€300,0006,300 t1,800 t
Investor C20%€200,0004,200 t1,200 t
Total100%€1,000,00021,000 t6,000 t

Future and realized credits in this example

  1. 1At validation

    The 6,000 tonnes planned in years 1 and 2 are bought as future credits, so the money funds the implementation and the holders carry the delivery risk.

  2. 2After each verification

    The 15,000 tonnes verified in years 3 to 5 are issued as realized credits, one per tonne in the verification report.

Cost per verified tonne

Spread over 5 years of credits, the project cost comes to €48 per verified tonne, a figure to compare with the internal carbon price or with the CBAM certificate cost an importer faces. Real prices are not shown.

Assumptions

  • Project cost €1,000,000, paid up front.
  • Full rate of 5,000 t a year from year 3.
  • Year 1 at 40% and year 2 at 80% while the heat pump ramps up.
  • Credits are split in line with what each funder paid.
  • One credit equals one verified tonne of CO₂e.
  • No real companies, prices or projects. Fees are not shown.
  • Illustrative split: the credits for years 1 and 2 are bought as future credits at validation; later years are taken as realized credits after each verification. The real split is agreed project by project.
Illustrative
Projection

Credits build over five years

Verified credits per year, split by funder, with the running total.

Future credits2,000Year 14,000Year 25,000Year 35,000Year 45,000Year 5

Credits per year, in tonnes

  • Buyer A (apparel brand) (50%)
  • Buyer B (apparel brand) (30%)
  • Investor C (20%)
  • Future credits, bought at validation

21,000 t in total over 5 years

Assumptions

  • Same project and shares as the worked example.
  • Every year passes verification at the full measured reduction.
  • Real results depend on the project and its verification.
  • Illustrative split: the credits for years 1 and 2 are bought as future credits at validation; later years are taken as realized credits after each verification. The real split is agreed project by project.
Rules and claims

How the claims are treated

Here is what each standard is, and how it treats a reduction inside a company’s own supply chain compared with one elsewhere in its industry.

GHG Protocol: Scope 3 Standard
What the standard is
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol sets the accounting rules most companies use for their emissions. Its Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard, published in 2011, covers the emissions in a company’s value chain in 15 categories, from purchased goods and transport to the use of sold products. It has no market-based method for Scope 3, so purchased certificates or credits do not change the Scope 3 figure, unlike electricity in Scope 2.
A reduction in the company’s own supply chain
A reduction at a supplier the company buys from lowers its Scope 3 inventory when it shows up in the data the company uses, for example a supplier-specific emission factor for the goods it purchases. A spend-based average will not show it.
A reduction in the industry, outside the company’s own supply chain
A reduction at a producer outside the company’s own supply chain is not part of its inventory under any method. It can be disclosed separately as an action, not as a lower Scope 3 figure.
What an inset credit does
When a supplier in the buyer’s own chain reduces emissions, the buyer’s Scope 3 goes down through lower supplier emissions data. The inset credit is the proof of that emissions reduction and who funded it, and it is not counted a second time. An emissions reduction outside the buyer’s own chain is reported separately, not as a lower Scope 3 figure. The GHG Protocol’s Actions and Market Instruments workstream is developing a market-based approach for Scope 3. A consolidated draft is expected for public consultation in the second quarter of 2027, and the revised standard in the fourth quarter of 2028. Each Carbon3 credit records the supplier, project, baseline and verification report, so it can be reported under the current rules and reassessed under the new ones.
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
What the standard is
The SBTi validates whether a company’s emissions reduction targets are consistent with climate science. Its Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 was published on 11 June 2026. Validations under it open on 1 February 2027, and it becomes mandatory for new target submissions from 1 February 2028. Targets already validated under the earlier version stay valid for their cycle. Target ambition is always set on the company’s physical inventory.
A reduction in the company’s own supply chain
Reductions that show up in the company’s inventory support emissions reduction claims. A project implemented by or on behalf of the company in its own value chain, with measured outcomes reported in proportion to its contribution, can support target implementation and an “alignment” claim.
A reduction in the industry, outside the company’s own supply chain
Action in a shared system the company draws on, such as a supply shed or logistics network, or at sector level, counts only where direct action in its own chain is constrained. It supports a separate “system contribution” claim, reported apart from the inventory.
What an inset credit does
Projects must be measured, additional and verifiable. Their outcomes must be uniquely attributed, with serialized tracking to prevent double counting. Credits a company sells on cannot also count for that company. The SBTi plans interim guidance on reporting projects and market instruments for consultation in the fourth quarter of 2026, so how a received inset credit is assessed is not yet fully settled.
EU rules on green claims
What the standard is
From 27 September 2026, EU consumer law (Directive 2024/825) bans claims that a product has a neutral, reduced or positive climate impact when the claim rests on compensating emissions with credits. Claims about measured reductions in the product’s own life cycle remain possible if they are substantiated.
A reduction in the company’s own supply chain
A product claim can rest on measured, substantiated reductions in that product’s own life cycle, which includes reductions at its suppliers.
A reduction in the industry, outside the company’s own supply chain
A reduction outside the product’s life cycle cannot support a claim that the product has a neutral, reduced or positive climate impact.
What an inset credit does
Inset credits support Scope 3 reporting and progress towards targets, not product neutrality claims. A product claim has to rest on measured reductions in that product’s life cycle. Credits never replace a company’s own emissions reductions.
Counting each tonne once
What the standard is
Double counting happens when two companies claim the same tonne, when one tonne is sold twice, or when a reduction is credited by two programs. Standards such as the SBTi’s now require serialized tracking to prevent it.
A reduction in the company’s own supply chain
Several companies in one chain can fund the same project. Each receives its own credits, each batch under its own record ID, so no tonne has two holders.
A reduction in the industry, outside the company’s own supply chain
The same rule applies wherever the tonne sits: one record, one holder, and no credit for a reduction already credited by another program.
What an inset credit does
Each batch of credits has its own record ID and exactly one holder on the Carbon3 registry. A transfer moves it rather than copying it, and retirement closes it permanently. A reduction already credited elsewhere is excluded at validation.

General information as of October 2026, not legal, accounting or reporting advice. Standards and regulations change; check the current text.

Find where insetting fits in a supply chain

Tell us about a project, a target or a portfolio.