The green fuel premium is shared, not absorbed
Cargo owners, regulators, lenders and fuel producers can each take a tranche of the premium, leaving the shipowner a much smaller gap.
A shipowner switching to green fuel faces a large cost premium. This chart from our 2026 Maritime & Shipping Outlook shows how that premium can be split across the value chain instead of landing on a single balance sheet.
In the illustrative case, a cargo-owner inset claim covers 38 percent of the premium as a Scope 3 reduction. Avoided regulatory cost under the EU ETS and FuelEU covers another 26 percent. Sustainability-linked debt takes 16 percent, and a fuel-producer offtake share takes 10 percent. The shipowner is left with a residual gap of about 10 percent, which shrinks further as the market thickens.
Decarbonising shipping is mostly a financial challenge. Insetting is the instrument that lets each party in the chain take its own tranche of it.
Originally published on LinkedIn, 6 May 2026.
Ethanol isn't a better marine fuel. It's an earlier one.
At the Clean Marine Fuel Forum in Singapore, the case for ethanol rests on three tests: the molecules exist, the assets already work, and the economics clear today.
Read insight
Ten years of the Clean Marine Fuel Forum
No single fuel or pathway to net zero, but progress cannot wait for perfect certainty. A recap of the 10th Clean Marine Fuel Forum in Singapore.
Read insight