Skip to main content
All insights

The cost case against green steel is eroding

CBAM is pushing the carbon cost on conventional steel toward the green premium. Price convergence still does not build capacity.

By Carbon3 team1 min read

Carbon3 point of view card, July 2026: 'CBAM is closing the green-steel price gap. It is not building the plant that closes the carbon gap.' Financing the capacity is a value-chain problem, which is where insetting fits.

The cost case against green steel is eroding, and carbon border pricing is doing the work. As CBAM phases out free allocation through 2034, the carbon cost on conventional steel is climbing toward $100 to $200 a tonne, converging on the $150 to $300 green premium.

Price convergence, however, does not build capacity. Producers need firm offtake before they will invest, and buyers need a claimable reduction before they will pay more. Neither side moves first.

Insetting resolves the standoff: buyers co-fund verified green capacity and take an allocated share of the reduction as a Scope 3 claim, giving producers the forward demand to build.

Document

The full document, as a PDF

Free to download once you have a free account. No payment details are needed.

Originally published on LinkedIn, 23 July 2026.

The Carbon3 Newsletter

Weekly analysis of industrial decarbonization and insetting across Scope 1 to 3, from the Carbon3 team.

Next step

See the companies behind these figures in the Data Hub.

Look up your suppliers’ emissions and targets, free.