A gas rally turned LNG in Rotterdam from a discount into a premium in one week
ENGINE reports that LNG and liquefied biomethane swung from discounts to premiums over marine gasoil, while pure biodiesel moved the other way, showing how fast the green premium moves.
By Carbon3 team2 min read

In Rotterdam, the cheaper ship fuel changed in a single week. ENGINE's Fuel Switch Snapshot reports that liquefied natural gas (LNG) burned in Otto medium-speed engines went from a $23 a tonne discount to low-sulfur marine gasoil to a $44 premium over it, as gas prices rallied.
How the prices moved
LNG is priced on the TTF gas contract, and the rally in that contract carried LNG with it. Liquefied biomethane (LBM), the renewable version of LNG, swung the same way, from $17 a tonne below low-sulfur marine gasoil to $42 above it.
Pure biodiesel (B100) went in the opposite direction. It moved from a $26 a tonne premium over high-sulfur fuel oil to a $62 discount.
These are not raw fuel prices. ENGINE adjusts them for energy content and includes estimated compliance costs for voyages within the EU, covering the EU Emissions Trading System and FuelEU Maritime penalties. Compliance is already part of the price a ship pays.
A moving green premium
For cargo owners and carriers, the lesson is that the green premium, the extra cost of a lower-emission fuel, is not a fixed number. It can change sign within a week, depending on gas prices, carbon prices and the fuel being compared.
That makes it harder to agree who pays for what. A carrier that commits to a lower-emission fuel takes on price risk, and a cargo owner that wants the reduction counted in its Scope 3, or value-chain, emissions needs a clear record of what it paid for.
One record for both sides
Credits are issued to the project developer after independent verification, and Carbon3 records each verified reduction once in its registry as inset credits. Carrier and cargo owner then work from the same figure, whatever the fuel cost that week. This is insetting, not offsetting, and the difference is explained at carbon3.net/insets-vs-offsets.
Claim treatment depends on the applicable reporting framework.
If the cheaper fuel can change every week, the open question is who should carry the green premium: the carrier or the cargo owner.
Source: ENGINE, "Fuel Switch Snapshot: Gas rally lifts LNG and LBM above LSMGO for Otto MS" (26 October 2026).
Originally published on LinkedIn, 30 October 2026.
The Carbon3 Newsletter
Weekly analysis of industrial decarbonization and insetting across Scope 1 to 3, from the Carbon3 team.
Read more from the research team.
Sector: Maritime
Bunkering in India costs far more than in Singapore, and not only for the fuel
A DNV study for IMO GreenVoyage2050 finds higher fuel prices and port fees in India, and says clean fuels there would need to be 5.5% to 7% cheaper than at the competing hub.
Read the articleSector: Maritime
Bridging the gap to maritime net zero
How the maritime sector can turn decarbonization from obligation into opportunity ahead of the extraordinary MEPC session.
Read the articleSector: Maritime
One green shipping fuel contract can commit a buyer to $1 billion or more
The Global Maritime Forum and the Getting to Zero Coalition price a 10-year green methanol or ammonia offtake at $1 billion to $1.7 billion, while nearly 300 capable ships are due by 2028.
Read the article
See the companies behind these figures in the Data Hub.
Look up your suppliers’ emissions and targets, free.


