Skip to main content
All insights

Agrifood emissions growth has shifted to packaging, shipping, waste and retail

On-farm practices remain the largest driver, but pre- and post-production services deserve closer attention for their Scope 3 impact.

By Carbon3 team1 min read

Carbon3 data card 'Food system emissions grew 21% since 2001, but the fastest-growing part isn't farming': pre- and post-production emissions grew 80% while farm-gate emissions grew 17%. Source: FAO.

Over the past 20+ years, the greatest growth in emissions in agrifood systems has actually been in packaging, shipping, waste, and retail handling. While on-farm practices remain a major driver of emissions, the pre- and post-production services deserve closer attention for how they impact the upstream Scope 3 emissions of the agricultural sector.

The shift changes where a food company should look for reductions. Farm-level interventions are still the largest opportunity in absolute terms, but they are slow to scale and hard to measure across many small producers. Packaging, cold chains, logistics and retail handling are concentrated in fewer hands, better instrumented, and often cheaper to change.

Both layers can be financed the same way. A retailer or brand that funds a supplier's switch to lower-carbon packaging or electrified distribution can claim the verified reduction against its own Scope 3 inventory, and the supplier recovers part of the cost through the same transaction. Insetting is agnostic about where in the chain the reduction sits.

Originally published on LinkedIn, 8 June 2026.

The Carbon3 Newsletter

Weekly analysis of industrial decarbonization and insetting across Scope 1 to 3, from the Carbon3 team.

Next step

See the companies behind these figures in the Data Hub.

Look up your suppliers’ emissions and targets, free.